<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Tory Party</title>
	<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp</link>
	<description>Feminism, film, computers and cookies</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Tales of Mere Existence</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/tales-of-mere-existence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/tales-of-mere-existence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/tales-of-mere-existence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Films and Comics by Lev




I gotta start making tiny movies like this. Seriously. I got no excuse.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ingredientx.com/">Films and Comics by Lev</a></p>
<object width="425" height="344">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfK7l2PcLjA&#038;hl=en"></param>
<param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param>
<p><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nfK7l2PcLjA&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<p>I gotta start making tiny movies like this. Seriously. I got no excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/tales-of-mere-existence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Daily Obama - Fighting Terrorism</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/your-daily-obama-fighting-terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/your-daily-obama-fighting-terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/your-daily-obama-fighting-terrorism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Reprinted without permission, and without commentary.)

&#8220;Osama bin Laden understands that he cannot defeat or even incapacitate the United States in a conventional war. What he and his allies can do is inflict enough pain to provoke a reaction of the sort we&#8217;ve seen in Iraq &#8212; a botched and ill-advised U.S. military incursion into a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(Reprinted without permission, and without commentary.)</i></p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;Osama bin Laden understands that he cannot defeat or even incapacitate the United States in a conventional war. What he and his allies can do is inflict enough pain to provoke a reaction of the sort we&#8217;ve seen in Iraq &#8212; a botched and ill-advised U.S. military incursion into a Muslim country, which in turn spurs on insurgencies based on religious sentiment and nationalist pride, which in turn necessitates a lengthy and difficult U.S. occupation, which in turn leads to an escalating death toll on the part of U.S. troops and the local civilian population. All of this fans anti-American sentiment among Muslims, increases the pool of potential terrorist recruits, and prompts the American public to question not only the war but also those policies that project us into the Islamic world in the first place.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the plan for winning a war from a cave, and so far, at least, we are playing to script. To change that script, we&#8217;ll need to make sure that any exercise of American military power helps rather than hinders our broader goals: to incapacitate the destructive potential of terrorist networks <i>and</i> win this global battle of ideas.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>- Barack Obama, &#8220;The Audacity of Hope&#8221;, p. 308</p>
<p>Next time: &#8220;What does this mean in practical terms?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/03/your-daily-obama-fighting-terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Song of Solomon/Bernini Mashup</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/02/song-of-solomonbernini-mashup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/02/song-of-solomonbernini-mashup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/02/song-of-solomonbernini-mashup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um. I don&#8217;t really know what this is about. I was going for a more sophisticated concept, but this ended up like something out of a naughtier Harriet Carter catalog:

And I put this on a poster at Zazzle for printing. You know &#8212; for that niche Bible/Greek mythology/Renaissance market.
Somewhere Kate Bush is happy and doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um. I don&#8217;t really know what this is about. I was going for a more sophisticated concept, but this ended up like something out of a naughtier Harriet Carter catalog:</p>
<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/sos-merger-sm.jpg' alt='Song of Solomon Bernini Mashup' /></p>
<p>And I put this on a <a href="http://www.zazzle.com/song_of_solomon_and_bernini_mashup_print-228268637417221478">poster at Zazzle</a> for printing. You know &#8212; for that niche Bible/Greek mythology/Renaissance market.</p>
<p>Somewhere Kate Bush is happy and doesn&#8217;t know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/02/song-of-solomonbernini-mashup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Daily Obama - Faith</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/your-daily-obama-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/your-daily-obama-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/your-daily-obama-faith/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Reprinted without permission from The Audacity of Hope. Presented with no commentary, because Obama speaks for himself, which is nice.)

The story of Abraham and Isaac offers a simple but powerful example&#8230; Of course, we know the happy ending&#8230; And yet it is fair to say that if any of us saw a twenty-first-century Abraham raising [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(Reprinted without permission from</i> The Audacity of Hope.<i> Presented with no commentary, because Obama speaks for himself, which is nice.)</i></p>
<blockquote><p>
The story of Abraham and Isaac offers a simple but powerful example&#8230; Of course, we know the happy ending&#8230; And yet it is fair to say that if any of us saw a twenty-first-century Abraham raising the knife on the roof of his apartment building, we would call the police; we would wrestle him down; even if we saw him lower the knife at the last minute, we would expect the Department of Children and Family Services to take Isaac away and charge Abraham with child abuse. We would do so because God doesn&#8217;t reveal Himself or His angels to all of us in a single moment. We do not hear what Abraham hears, do not see what Abraham sees, true as those experience may be. So the best we can do is act in accordance with those things that are possible for all of us to know, understanding that a part of what we know to be true &#8212; as individuals of communities of faith &#8212; will be true for us alone<br /><Br><br />
Finally, any reconciliation between faith and democratic pluralism requires some sense of proportion. This is not entirely foreign to religious doctrine; even those who claim the Bible&#8217;s inerrancy make distinctions between Scriptural edicts, based on a sense that some passages &#8212; the Ten Commandments, say, or a belief in Christ&#8217;s divinity &#8212; are central to Christan faith, while others are more culturally specific and may be modified to accommodate modern life. The American people intuitively understand this, which is why the majority of Catholics practice birth control and some of those opposed to gay marriage nevertheless are opposed to a constitutional amendment banning it. Religious leadership need not accept such wisdom in couseling their flocks, but they should recognize this wisdom in their politics.
</p></blockquote>
<p>- Barack Obama, <i>The Audacity of Hope</i>, pp. 220 - 221</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/your-daily-obama-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warning - Male Gaze</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/warning-male-gaze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/warning-male-gaze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/warning-male-gaze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh heh. This was commissioned by Stephan Zielinski, science-fiction author, photographer, and fellow zombie-enthusiast, as he sought a caveat for his photographs of this year&#8217;s Dyke Festival in San Francisco.

Good times. Good ti-i-i-i-i-imes.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh heh. This was commissioned by <a href="http://stephan-zielinski.com/">Stephan Zielinski</a>, science-fiction author, photographer, and fellow zombie-enthusiast, as he sought a caveat for his photographs of this year&#8217;s Dyke Festival in San Francisco.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/warning-sign-1.jpg' title='Heteronormative Male Gaze'><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/warning-sign-sm.jpg' alt='warning-sign-sm.jpg' /></a></p>
<p>Good times. Good ti-i-i-i-i-imes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/07/01/warning-male-gaze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFA - Below the Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/dfa-below-the-belt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/dfa-below-the-belt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/dfa-below-the-belt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Wow. They just keep coming. I don&#8217;t even have to look offa Facebook for them. And this one has the super-exciting combination of:

Crotch
Pulling off undies
Phallic bananas pointing at lady parts

Wow. Just. Wow. This is 100 pixels away from a Hustler cover.
I give it three out of five Leers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/dfa-dangerous.png' alt='DFA dangerous' /></p>
<p>Wow. They just keep coming. I don&#8217;t even have to look offa Facebook for them. And this one has the super-exciting combination of:</p>
<ul>
<li>Crotch</li>
<li>Pulling off undies</li>
<li>Phallic bananas pointing at lady parts</li>
</ul>
<p>Wow. Just. Wow. This is 100 pixels away from a Hustler cover.</p>
<p>I give it three out of five Leers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/dfa-below-the-belt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problem with Bejeweled</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/problem-with-bejeweled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/problem-with-bejeweled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/problem-with-bejeweled/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would enjoy Bejeweled more if it didn&#8217;t make me think of The Gift. &#8220;TRY TO THINK A NICE THOUGHT ABOUT A BLUE DIAMOND!&#8221;
I guess if I ate Lucky Charms, that would be weird, too.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would enjoy Bejeweled more if it didn&#8217;t make me think of <b>The Gift</b>. &#8220;TRY TO THINK A NICE THOUGHT ABOUT A BLUE DIAMOND!&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess if I ate Lucky Charms, that would be weird, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/problem-with-bejeweled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/political-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/political-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/political-roundup/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
India is doing more about climate change than we are. India, people!
Oh, those tax and spend Democrats and those fiscally responsible Republicans. Waitaminnit:

Hmm. I know you gotta account for inflation, and look at the debt as a percent of GDP and blah blah blah&#8230;

Non-defense discretionary spending as percent of GDP
2001 3.4 final budget under Bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7481259.stm"">India is doing more about climate change than we are.</a> <i>India</i>, people!</li>
<li>Oh, those tax and spend Democrats and those fiscally responsible Republicans. Waitaminnit:<br />
<img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/picture-1.png' alt='picture-1.png' /></p>
<p>Hmm. I know you gotta account for inflation, and look at the debt as a percent of GDP and blah blah blah&#8230;<br />
<img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/chart-us-budget.png' alt='chart-us-budget.png' /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.epi.org/printer.cfm?id=2806&#038;content_type=1&#038;nice_name=webfeatures_snapshots_20071010">Non-defense discretionary spending as percent of GDP</a></p>
<blockquote><p>2001 3.4 final budget under Bill Clinton</p>
<p>2002 3.7 initial budget under George Bush<br />
2003 3.9<br />
2004 3.8<br />
2005 3.9<br />
2006 3.7<br />
2007 3.6<br />
2008 3.6</p>
<p>Defense discretionary spending as percent of GDP</p>
<p>2001 3.0 final budget under Bill Clinton</p>
<p>2002 3.4 initial budget under George Bush<br />
2003 3.7<br />
2004 3.9<br />
2005 4.0<br />
2006 4.0<br />
2007 4.0<br />
2008 4.3
</p></blockquote>
<p>Wait, that is SO WEIRD. It almost makes it look like George W. is spending more than Clinton. That is so super weird, because I remember George W. cutting taxes a whole bunch. How are we paying for all this? I&#8217;m not even starting to argue about what the US should be spending money on. We can safely agree that we ARE spending money &#8212; shouldn&#8217;t we be paying more taxes instead of going into debt?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll even take a totally non-cynical view of George W.&#8217;s tax cuts and say that their intent is purely to stoke the struggling economy. Do we think that&#8217;s going to work? What about our current money plan is going to change things for the future? </p>
<ul>
<li>Taxpayers will spend it. They&#8217;ll buy a TV on Tuesday, which will be good for the store, distributor, and TV manufacturers on Tuesday. Then on Wednesday the money and its effects are gone. Nothing has changed systemically. It was just another bubble. God forbid the taxpayer spend their &#8216;extra&#8217; money on personal debt, affecting the economy not at all.</li>
<li>The government is spending its money on today&#8217;s problems. That&#8217;s good, because today&#8217;s problems need attending to. Pro- or anti-war, as long as we have people over there, it is our responsibility to supply them. Pro- or anti-Medicare, as long as we have people relying on those services, it is our responsibility to supply them. But today&#8217;s problems are going to stay with us (even Jesus said so). The trick is planning for the future while working on the present. Maybe if we were going into debt
<p>(If I were feeling really nutty, I might structure an argument here about how having so many servicepeople overseas is bad for the economy. They&#8217;re not here designing, engineering, producing goods, or even consuming. They&#8217;re over there getting shot at. I mean, let&#8217;s toss aside talk about morality, humanity and foreign policy &#8212; let&#8217;s talk about MONEY!)</li>
<li>Conceivably the less-taxed corporations could pass the money on to consumers in the form of cheaper goods, or invest in new technologies to boost the future economy. Conceivably. But from what I can see of corporations, they seem to be oriented to maximizing profit in the short term. What company is going to invest thirty-million dollars in experimental research that might pay off in ten years when that money could be funneled directly to shareholders? And what fantastic-amazing board of directors would give the thumbs-up to that kind of investment? Do we want to stake our whole economic future on that possibility?</li>
</ul>
<li><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/04/08/8155/">US Lawmakers Invested in Iraq War</a> - Ewwww. Ewwwwwww. Again, pro- or anti-war, I think we can agree that a senator voting to start a war and then trying to profit from it is just bad form. It seems like even baseline moral compunction would drive you to actively seek NOT to profit from a war you started. &#8220;Hey, wait &#8212; didn&#8217;t y&#8217;all just get a defense contract? Hrm. I think I should maybe NOT buy your stock. I dunno. Just feels weird.&#8221;
</li>
<li>A-a-a-and spent.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/30/political-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall-E</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/29/wall-e/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/29/wall-e/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Thoughtful Heckler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/29/wall-e/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
R U Ri U R U U Ri
Um.
I am so sorry.
I think there&#8217;s something wrong with me.
When a movie has 98% Fresh on RottenTomatoes, and it doesn&#8217;t quite do it for me, I think the problem is obvious, and it starts with T.
So if I tell you I preferred Kung Fu Panda to Wall-E &#8212; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/wall-e_2.jpg' alt='wall-e_2.jpg' /><br />
<B>R U Ri U R U U Ri</b></p>
<p>Um.</p>
<p>I am so sorry.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s something wrong with me.</p>
<p>When a movie has 98% Fresh on RottenTomatoes, and it doesn&#8217;t quite do it for me, I think the problem is obvious, and it starts with T.</p>
<p>So if I tell you I preferred <strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong> to <strong>Wall-E</strong> &#8212; kind of a lot &#8212; I know that I am coming from a place of madness. MADNESS. But while I was watching <strong>Kung Fu Panda</strong> &#8212; like, by the second act &#8212; I thought, &#8220;I&#8217;m gonna have to see this again.&#8221; <strong>Wall-E</strong> &#8212; not so much.</p>
<p>SPOILERS FOLLOW.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/wall-e.jpg' alt='wall-e.jpg' /><br />
<b>OK but all the robot stuff was ossome</b></p>
<p>SERIOUSLY. SPOILERS FOLLOW.</p>
<p>I feel like a dystopic future movie needs to have a little more science or a little more whimsy. This one&#8217;s Tomorrowland at Magic Kingdom just didn&#8217;t address the big questions for me &#8212; can you just &#8216;take up&#8217; farming in a polluted city? Hell, is there oxygen, considering there are no plants? How many will die when the first dust storm overtakes them? Where are the other ships? Did everyone get to escape Earth, or just the ones who could afford the intergalactic cruise line? Why does Otto take one order against its will but no others? </p>
<p>Consumption propels the society (blue is the new red) but no one seems to have a job. There are children but people appear too physically weak to reproduce. There&#8217;s no hierarchy, no competing objectives &#8212; not even among the robots herding them. The film thematically centers on &#8220;do what is right, not what you&#8217;re told.&#8221; Yet the passengers group-think their obedience to the captain as readily as they do to advertising and robots.</p>
<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/wall-e-garlin.jpg' alt='wall-e-garlin.jpg' /><br />
<b>Good luck finding stills of the Wall-E people. Here&#8217;s Jeff Garlin instead.</b></p>
<p>The trailers for Wall-E made me think he would be leaving Earth to join a ship of robots. I think I would have dug that better &#8212; robots who have adopted the habits of their long-extinct human originators. Then much of this satire could have proceeded unhindered by an actual need for plausible, reversible human behavior. A unifying feature of dystopic future stories is that the society at large is not redeemed at the end &#8212; usually the heroes find their own redemption (or demise) as the group does business as usual, or&#8230; you know&#8230; they all die. &#8216;All die&#8217; is a bit of a fixture. &#8216;Cause of all the dystopia, doncha know.</p>
<p>I could dig a few people electing to go back with the &#8216;bots. But I can&#8217;t really buy so many people overturning 700 years of complacency because the captain walked across a room.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td><b>Story</b></td>
<td><b>Hero(es)</b></td>
<td><b>Everyone else</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Blade Runner</td>
<td>escape</td>
<td>business as usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>On the Beach</td>
<td>die</td>
<td>dies</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Road Warrior</td>
<td>esape</td>
<td>business as usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>I Am Legend</td>
<td>die</td>
<td>dies</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brazil</td>
<td>die</td>
<td>business as usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>The Stand</td>
<td>escape</td>
<td>dies</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Idiocracy</td>
<td>didn&#8217;t see it</td>
<td>but I meant to</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>The thing with the plant didn&#8217;t make sense to me, either. &#8220;If we find just one plant on the entire planet, we can go home.&#8221; HUH? REALLY? So in order to turn the ship around, you put the plant in this one thingy, and that&#8217;s the only way to do it, by the way.&#8221; HUH? REALLY?</p>
<p>So. The human plot didn&#8217;t fly for me. The robot plot did a lot better, but still:</p>
<ul>
<li>I wish Wall-E hadn&#8217;t held Eve&#8217;s hand while she was out of commission. I&#8217;ll spare you a rape allegory, but the hand-holding is the big consummation of their relationship, and it should have been left &#8217;til the end. As it is, he sorta force-holds it, while looking at a sunset. It is unclear how he feels about this compromise. So when Eve takes his hand at the end, it&#8217;s sort of lacking, like, &#8220;Hey, babe &#8212; hate to break it to ya, but I already did this with you while you were asleep. OOPS.&#8221; </li>
<li>I wasn&#8217;t moved when Wall-E loses his Wall-E-ness. Contrast this with the fact that Johnny 5&#8217;s brush with death in <b>Short Circuit 2</b> makes me cry <i>every time</i>. I feel like Pixar pulled a Disney here &#8212; shying away from the frightening emotional core. Wall-E gets incapacitated by a motherboard-frying, then pulls it together enough to start running around again (or did he get fixed and I miss it? I remember a fade to black in the junkyard). He blocks a lowering platform, but we see this in only wide shots &#8212; no indication of what Wall-E is going through. Is he struggling heroically? Is he allowing himself to be killed for the greater good? We speed through Wall-E&#8217;s loss of humanity to the resolution &#8212; there is no montage of Eve toting him around as he did her, which could have worked.
<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/wall-e-johnny-5.jpg' alt='wall-e-johnny-5.jpg' /><br />
<b>10 if short circuit 2 goto 30<br />
20 goto 40<br />
30 sob<br />
40 end<br />
</b></p>
<p>Contrast this with the end of <b>Monster&#8217;s Inc</b>, where the story so completely convinces that I was fooled twice in a row &#8212; and still cry today.</p>
<p>Hell &#8212; I misted over at the halfway mark of <b>Kung Fu Panda</b>.</li>
<li>Wall-E disappears for a while. That&#8217;s weird. It might have been better if HE was the source of historical information for the captain &#8212; if HIS unique perspective of humanity was what convinced the crew to go back. That could have worked. Show his recorded montage of human awesomeness. Convince the captain, convince the passengers. Make the passengers more active uprisers. Dude. I am a genius.</li>
</ul>
<p>Time for nitpicks!</p>
<ul>
<li>Noise in space. WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT THIS. I know, I&#8217;m being unfair &#8212; everybody does it. The sound mixer would kick the director&#8217;s butt.</li>
<li>The ship tilts, and everyone slides, a la <i>Titanic</i>. That shouldn&#8217;t work, right? No matter how gravity is generated on the ship, right?</li>
</ul>
<p>But the closing credits were totally bangin&#8217;. J&#8217;approve 100%. Kate Bush does Narnia; Peter Gabriel does Wall-E. Everybody happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/29/wall-e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFA - This time it&#8217;s personal</title>
		<link>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/28/dfa-this-time-its-personal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/28/dfa-this-time-its-personal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tory</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Amusements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/28/dfa-this-time-its-personal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Dear Facebook,
Please stop taking pictures of me on the beach. 
This one must be old, as I haven&#8217;t been on a beach in a bathing suit since the shrimp larvae incident of ninety-nine.
Sincerely,
Tory
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/dfa-personal.jpg' alt='Disembodied Female Abdomens - personal' /></p>
<p>Dear Facebook,</p>
<p>Please stop taking pictures of me on the beach. </p>
<p>This one must be old, as I haven&#8217;t been on a beach in a bathing suit since the shrimp larvae incident of ninety-nine.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Tory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetoryparty.com/wp/2008/06/28/dfa-this-time-its-personal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
