stagger lee on love geometry, calculus, and comparative politics

Posted by staggerlee, July 30, 2005 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements | 16 Comments

you know, i`m good at math. i`m good at applied math. but one thing i suck at is emotional math.

why do they call it a love triangle anyway? i understand that it’s about three people who are linked together, with not all necessarily equal parts. but nobody ever talks about love trapezoids or love hexagons. doesn’t it just get worse? what about love algebra: spontenatity(x)=irresponsiblity, solve for x. (x would equal hate or relationship problems, because everything you love about someone when the relationship is new is everything you hate about them later.) do people just look at potential girl/boyfriends with y =mx + b on their minds? what about when it gets into love calculus? how do you find the derivative of a bad relationship? is it hate? is it love? is it indifference? can someone seriously tell me the intergral of “i`m dating a stupid bitch/jackass, and i want her/him out of my life?” and i shudder to think of a love fractal. it might warp my fragile little mind.

please believe that in saying that, i am admitting guilt. everyone’s done it. i`m especially bad for trying to be in love with more than one person at a time. and sometimes, i just think it will work, but i didn’t take my variables into account, or i don’t show my work, or i just don’t understand the expression. i’ve done and said some fucked up shit, when i`m trying to do my love math homework. i’ve told people that i`m only with them because i couldn’t get what i wanted. i’ve told people that i loved them just so i could get laid. i’ve told people that i didn’t love them when all i really wanted was to be with them. i’ve tried to have two separate relationships at the same time, and was shocked when everyone couldn’t play nice. i’ve dumped people i truly loved, just for a chance with someone i really lusted (or loved, depending on which way the story’s told) after, only to find out that they only seem to want me when i`m unattainable. i have refused to believe my friends when they ask me, “hey, are you sure this is where you want to be?” sometimes, they even tell me, “dude, run, this really isn’t where you want to be.” and, of course, i don’t do it.

one theorem i know for a fact, when it comes to this nasty love math stuff, is this: if one or two of your friends don’t like your partner/siginificant other/girlfriend/husband/fuck buddy, it’s probably something that has nothing to do with you. when all of your friends don’t like them, you might want to take careful note of the situation.

another one i`m sure about, hate is not the opposite of love. both are passionate responses to the same stimuli, it’s just that one’s emotionally positive and the other is not. i`m deliberately not assigning a “word”, as the case may be, to either the positive or the negative. depending on the situation, either one can be good or bad. i really think that the true opposite of love is indifference. that being said, you’re not really over someone until you just don’t care–no, wait, i won’t go that far. you’re not really over someone until you can think about them, good and bad, and say that whatever happened between you two (or three, or eight. some people are enterprising.) happened for a reason, and the best possible solution was whatever happened. and it doesn’t count if you can say it to other people. it only counts if you believe it for yourself. after all, you’re the one who has to live with it.

i don’t think it should be love math at all. that’s too snarky. emotions are so much more than three-dimensonal, but i don’t forsee any love tesseracts. if there were, there would be a lot more love time travel. you know, when you wake up next to someone that you (supposedly) love and feel a burning desire to…

stab them in the eye with a rusty fork…

it’s time to bail. if there were love tesseracts, people would go back in time and leave before that ever happened.

i should know. i used to be notorious for dating people for 6 months. the longest relationship i’ve had (not counting my current one) was 3 years, and those weren’t continuous. and it was only that long because i was too lazy to dump the asshole. i actually had a countdown of “days until i can dump kim” when we got close to 180 days together, because my relationships typically reach critical mass and go nuclear around the six month mark. then she got me tickets to the sting/annie lennox concert (which was fucking awesome), and i couldn’t leave her. maybe that’s her plan–keep taking me to concerts and i`ll never leave nor forsake her. kd lang was sweet, ani difranco rocked, and she’s taking me to see tori amos and imogene heap in august, so it must be working.

i`m completely sure of another thing: everything has to be tailored to accomodate everyone’s needs, wants, and greed. if you know you’re dating a sex fiend that occasionally has a thing for, say, for getting marshmellow peeps melted on their skin so you can lick it off, you can’t really deny them that. if you’re dating someone, and you know you can’t be faithful, then break it off, or drop the expectation of fidelity. i`m the type of person that can have a one night stand that doesn’t mean shit, especially if i`m dating someone i love, and the “victim” (for lack of a better term) of my horniness is nothing but a means to an end. but at the same time, i can’t kiss, or really hang out with someone i’ve got more than a physical thing for or with, with all other things considered as equal. some people have to have that expectation of fidelity, because that’s all they know. other people, they`ll pick loyalty over fidelity every time. it’s all about what works for everyone. now that i’ve been in a relationship that doesn’t expect 100 percent pure fidelity, i see that maybe that’s what my problem was. it’s not that i love kim more, or that i loved everyone else less; it’s just that i simply didn’t have the willpower to say no to something that i knew would be wrong. call it implusive, sabotage, or whatever you want to call it. i call it effective.

now that i think about it, it’s definitely not love math. more of a love poltics thing. think about it: what if you’re trying to hook up with someone you don’t think you have a chance with? if you send your friends to talk you up , it’s lobbying. if you try to buy your way in, it’s bribery. trying to be something you’re not is treachery. telling them something you don’t really believe is lying. not listening to your friends for crucial advice is prideful. and sending in your friends to get back at them after they fuck you over is called war. holy fucking republican, man! my love life is fahrenheit 9/11?! now i get it!

Topless Drunken Zombie Mexicans

Posted by Tory, July 27, 2005 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements | 10 Comments

I don’t know how to explain. Maybe I shouldn’t. Suffice it to say in an email a friend used the term “topless drunken zombie Mexicans,” and shortly thereafter I found myself drawing the following:

See, the thing is, I like drawing hot chicks. But I have no *reason* to draw hot chicks. You might say, hey, baby, you don’t need no reason, but it becomes difficult to explain to people why I have a sketchbook full of hot imaginary women.

And now I’ve discovered a challenge, and thus a reason: create the hot chick from four random adjectives. Right now I`m working on one from four drawn from Lowell Thomas` This Side of Hell: first fancy mint Moroccan. She’s coming along rather well, I think — quite sh-bompin` — and she`ll be done shortly.

Anyway, if you like progressions of things, check this out (click on any to view a larger version):




Fresh out of the scanner



With the colors blocked in, before shrinking for fine work



Accents, finessing and way too many light effects, but that’s how I like it.

I worry that I like the black-and-white version more than the full-color version — prolly because I`m a better penciler than colorist. If you want to do your own coloring job, you can get the big-ass original scan by clicking here. Fun with jpegs!

I also have a much bigger image of the final product, but a-a-a-apparently I can’t remember to bring such things to upload. Will add soon, for those who like topless drunken zombie Mexicans enough to want it 1000 pixels wide. Um. I guess that would be me.

Fun with Print Screen

Posted by Tory, July 26, 2005 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements | No Comments

Sometimes a banner ad just won’t be ignored. Check this out:



The abbreviations… they burn…

This bird has problems. It weaves languidly and peers at itself with a fevered, hyperthyroid eye. Would you get a mortgage from this bird? I hope not.

I don’t even know what these things are, but they dance and they’re terrifying.



Dance… dance forever…

Because nothing in the world is scarier than ass cheeks, some last-minute effort to protect the world’s youth puts a digital skirt on this ass. Almost as funny as all the digital bra parade known as “Showgirls on VH-1.”



New from Land’s End

Also notice the awkward way the product is cut-and-pasted into her hand — it goes well with the crappy way they shaved off her left flank. These are the perils of modeling — one minute, you’re showing off your fabulous ass in a clip-art photo session, and the next minute some crappy graphic artist makes crappy pixelated changes and you’re glad you didn’t authorize use of your face.

Because if they use your face, this might happen:



Your options include seppuku

This woman is doomed forever to peer behind that sheaf of hair for match.com, as she seeks men as young as 18 but no older than Hugh Jackman to send her pictures she can laugh at and ignore.

But she is just a model. This guy is not:



Ten minutes with me will make you pierce your own eardrums

Also in the not-so-tempting offers department:



`Cause you`ll need this if you date through match.com

Check out that “cash transactions only” caveat. That is impossibly shady. I would click to investigate, but I`m afraid tously brunettes would tell me too much about their sex lives.



With just that hint of insanity that’s so attractive in a woman

That was fun.

War of the Worlds

Posted by Tory, July 25, 2005 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements, Thoughtful Heckler | 8 Comments

War of the Worlds. I`m glad I saw it in the theater, but I got beefs. I got beefs like Hebrew National.


The Dark Crystal mates with Rand-McNally

It started out perfectly tight and solid and here’s Spielberg showing you exactly what he wants you to see and making you feel exactly how he wants you to feel, and he’s ratcheting up the suspense and making me jump and gasp like a little girl (but not like a ten-year-old girl — get to that later). Almost everything up to Tom Cruise breaking down in the diner is totally hang ten; everything after that kinda comes apart.


Be cool — I think I just saw Mimi Rogers…

Now that I think of it, it seems like all my complaints are with the writing, not the directing, which makes sense, because it’s hard to think of a director as in command of an audience as Spielberg. And, unlike James Cameron, I don’t hate him.

But I got beefs.

  • Alien invasion as family drama has been done — and done better — in Signs. See, in Signs people had things like “character arcs” and “characteristics.” The six-year-old girl wasn’t screaming and crying the whole time (still getting to that later). In fairness, I realize what I like the best in these apocalypse movies is how things go from normal to all fubar, and that was 90% of Signs and 15% of this one.
  • The creature design for the aliens was not happenin`. Maybe the point is that they’re not physically intimidating, but I wanted something a little more H. R. Giger and a little less baby-faced Grays with a head ridge. Maybe that’s just me.
  • Dakota Fanning’s character (believe her name was “Rachel” — it was, like, every other line of dialogue) is *ten*. Yet Tom Cruise carries her the whole damn movie.


    Dad, I`m totally ten. You can put me down.

    This might not bother me except 1) kids too old to be carried getting carried is one of my dad’s pet peeves, so I tend to be on high alert for it, and 2) she cries and panics and flips out like a much younger kid as well. I know she’s Dakota Fanning and a better bet to have in your movie than looking for someone younger, but *sheesh.* Did anybody pick you up and carry you when you were ten? Hell, when you were *six*? Would you throw a screaming and crying fit out of fear?


    Honey, stop upstaging me.

    Compare this character to ten-year-old Joseph Mazzello from Jurassic Park. Yeah. Think about that.

    I would have liked to have at least seen her get tougher as the movie goes on. Maybe contribute to solving one problem. But no.

  • The aliens` EMPs take out all the cars. Fine. The mechanic-on-the-corner replaces the solenoids on Tom Cruise’s car to get it going again. Fine. I don’t remember no stinking physics, but wouldn’t the solenoids on the mechanic’s shelf *also* be ruined? Or if the alien EMP only takes out those solenoids with current running through them, wouldn’t it spare those vehicles that weren’t running at the time of the EMP? Yet it looks like Tom Cruise has the only working car in the world.

    Heh heh heh… EXCEPT a totally unnecessary expository news van, which shows up later with all its equipment in perfect working order. How did that happen? Why isn’t Tom Cruise’s first question “how is your van still working?” I worry too much.

  • The aliens buried the “tripods” — a who-o-ole lot of them — long enough ago that there’s no human memory (presumably before the age of people — exposition journalist offers “a million years”) and whatever microbe kills them off hasn’t evolved yet. Apparently the aliens knew they would eventually want earth, yet this was somehow a less attractive time to invade than right now. Maybe this was an over-population allegory, I dunno, but it’s hard for me to believe that aliens would rather take over the world *now* rather than a million years ago when the whole place was pristine and there were lots of nice big slow animals running around. But maybe they were too busy burying spaceships impossibly deep in the ground to worry about that kind of stuff. Plan your work and work your plan.
  • Furthermore, when it comes to aliens using humans for their own diabolical purposes, I tend to like the “present an attractive front and extend promises of friendship” strategy of V. I would have preferred these warfaring aliens treat us like pests to exterminate (the way they do in the first half, which is inconsistent with later revelations.)
  • What defeats the aliens has nothing to do with the protagonists. It’s irrelevant, even. Sure, that’s the deal with the original story, and it’s a cool idea that our gross people germs kill them off, just like all the fun diseases European colonists brought when they came to share the western hemisphere in peace and harmony with its natives.


    Everyone takes a break from crying to enjoy the production design

    But it has stone cold nothing to do with anything, and it’s not foreshadowed. I would have liked there to have been at least a bug going around, one cough, one mention of germs, *anything.* Maybe Dakota Fanning could have had the flu, and that would help explain her helplessness. Maybe she could even sneeze in proximity to an alien, which could have added a new element to…

  • …the totally mimeographed Jurassic-Park-kitchen scene. Remember that scene? In Jurassic Park? Where the two kids silently move around a kitchen to avoid the raptors that are searching for them? Now imagine it’s in a basement. And paced much more slowly. And not ramping up to the climax. There you go.
  • While we’re here, everything with Tim Robbins could have been cut.


    Alarmed by Tim’s wifebeater, Dakota spikes the camera

    There was no point to it, except for Tom Cruise’s character to prove he’s no better than the aliens by killing a man for his resources. Lame.

  • Oh, man, how could I forget this one — when the alien invasion comes, remind be to be in Boston! Count this among the dubious messages of this movie: rich people not only live, but emerge from their unscathed homes wearing unscathed cardigans! Yay for money!

A-a-a-and ka-spent.

Name an Evocative Smell: Survey Says…

Posted by Tory, July 21, 2005 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements | 9 Comments

So this is weird.

I was reading a magazine and it had one of those perfume scratch-and-sniff peel-apart ads. So far not weird. It was for “Obsession: Night for Men,” and had this typical picture of Calvin Klein sullen squinty androgynous people in dark water (starring Jennifer Connelly OMG!). Also not weird.


Spooky perfume

For some reason I went and smelt what the ad dealt, and my knee-jerk reaction was “oh, I don’t like that at all.” (This is prolly because I am used to trucking in lady perfumes, not man perfumes, cos…)

Hey wait a minnit…

Sniff #2 reveals that I know this cologne from somewhere… and that I *like* it. Now, the ad says “a new fragrance yada yada,” so I could be totally making this up and never have smelt it before (what I`m thinking is that it isn’t so different from Regular Old Obsession for Men and that’s what I’ve smelt.)

The point is suddenly I realized what this cologne evoked for me was that I smelt it on someone who was hot. Can’t remember who. And I dunno if it was someone I had the hots for on general principle or just the hots right then at that moment.

A year ago this wouldn’t have been a hard mystery to crack. But there are three mitigating factors with film school:

  • You have to stand still in close quarters a lot. So I`m 1st AC and crammed in the shadow-proof corner with the boom op for a three-minute take and God help us if either of us forgot pit stick this morning. This means I know what people smell like when ordinarily only their girlfriend or mom or barber would. This also means when people are smelly, and damn there are some smelly ones, you are all up in it.


    Smelly!

  • When you are on set, at least in my experience, an extraordinary proportion of people are hot for about five minutes. Like, OMG you reverse engineered the digital compressor for the Stage 5 camera and fixed the dead pixel YOU ARE SO HOT RITE NOW*. Then a couple of minutes later they do something obnoxious and you’re back to normal.

    *Imaginary B.S. situation I made up. That pixel is never coming back.

    Also you’re sorta sleep-deprived usually, and if that impairs your driving as much as booze you can be sure it impairs your hottness judgment as well. You got to make sure someone is teh sexay for, say, three days straight before you make an investment.

  • When you are acting in someone’s movie, you become *not like the others. Here. In this trailer park.* You can’t move lights or get apple boxes anymore. You just have to stay on your mark and remember your lines and try could you please just try to be quieter between takes kthx? So if there’s another actor in the movie (and as these first year films go it tends to be just two actors) there`ll be fifteen people buzzing around you and you still feel like you’re the last people on earth.

    This may be why actors hook up so much. Though that may also be because actors are incredibly slutty (OMG just kidding! Students of all arts disciplines are equally slutty.)


    It can be a problem.

    In any event, I`m unable to rule out that I just sniffed a fellow actor on set and deeply felt that fishbowl bond and thought he was teh sexay. I can think about things like that on set due to my brain is not cluttered with thoughts about how to be a good actor. Due to I suck.

So eventually I`m going to figure out who wears Obsession for Men (a $50 cologne should already narrow the suspects) or something that smells right like it, and I`m going to be either relieved or incredibly embarrassed.

That is a long story. But I worry about things like this, like when I read that line in The Watchmen that said “Superheroes are finished. These days, it’s all pirates,” and I flashed that *someone* had quoted that line to me very recently, and I had just made a silly cow face like, “that was wacky,” because I didn’t get it! I didn’t get it… yet.

And now I have to ask around in the fall to figure out who put this thought in my brain. I have my suspicions, such as the Dungeon Master of a DIY jello-wrestling RPG I played at the last party I went to before I left school. Because that happened.

Anyway — what stories of evocative and startling smells do you have? Like, I can’t cross a sewer without thinking (fondly) of benjo ditches in Okinawa. Ohhh memories.

What smell brings a context or story flooding back to you?

Discuss.

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^