The Tory Party
Feminism, film, computers and cookies
Spiderman 2
Posted by Tory, August 28, 2004 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements |Heh heh heh. Heh heh heh heh heh. This movie made me happy. Even when it was silly and maudlin, which it was at times in turn and at once, it satisfied my movie appetite. I do melodrama. I do over-the-top. Whatever Sam Raimi’s selling, I`ll buy it.

Wonder-booooooys — what is the secret of your pow-aaaah?
Plot spoilers are grayed out, but gag spoilers are free in the breeze, so be warned.
- I gotta believe Raimi had fun doing this. Like, I`m so jealous I could faint fun. There were three scene transitions that made me smile — like actually teeth-exposing smile. And I feel like he must have had more creative control with this one, which would make sense with the first Spiderman making a couple of shekels and all, and he was like, if I want to recreate Evil Dead 2 when they’re operating on Doc Ock, by God, I`m gonna do it. There was a chainsaw and everything. And a lot of women screaming — a LOT. Not brief “Aiieee!” screams either, but these huge long squalling Wilhelms from at least four different women. So Raimi. So very Raimi.
- Raimi also pulled off a lot of samey action — a LOT of flinging, swinging, falling and leaping. I didn’t mind. It reminded me that one advantage of living in the Triangle is if you want to fall off something with more than three stories you got to drive to Charlotte.
- Going in, I didn’t really like Tobey Maguire. Seemed like he always played the same dude — wide-eyed naif — just sort of reacting to stuff around him. This movie turned my ship around for him the same way Down With Love did for Renee Zellweger. He got to do all kinds of crazy crap, and he worked it — from stopping a speeding subway to dorking around to “Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head.” However on some level I still pine for Christopher Daniel Barnes (Greg Brady from the new Brady movies, and the boy from “Day By Day”) to have this role — he’s the voice of Spiderman in everything animated, and for me he utterly embodies Peter Parker. He would have been doe-eyed and moppy. He would have schooled. I would have peed. But Tobey’s good, too.

C. D. Barnes — Even as Greg Brady he is teh hottness. - This movie was weirdly dark. It was like that moment in Finding Nemo when I realized the message is that parents have to let go of their kids and what kind of kids` movie in the world has a message that sophisticated? So here the message is (not Rosemary Harris` warbly “Theah’s a HEE-rooo in ALL of us” but) that sacrificing yourself for others is not necessarily satisfying. So dark. I was especially impressed that you actually get to see Peter Parker turn his back on opportunities to be heroic. So dark. So Raimi.

Somehow this is what I thought of before “Spider House Rules.” Bwahh! Bet no one ever had THAT idea! - There was some silliness, as I mentioned. The sciencey parts, f`rinstance, but what’s really silly is me because none of the sciencey parts bothered me as much as Rosie Octavius` saying when they met “he was studying science.” Not physics, or chemistry, but “science.” What, were they in the fourth grade? Also silly was how, when Doc Ock is having his first conversation with his robot arms, he turns around toward daylight and has really, really obvious makeup under his eyes to give him spooky tortured scientist eyes. Heh heh heh. Maybe it’s Maybelline. Not that I minded, or that I minded that developing artificial intelligence, let alone mechanical limbs that you can control with your brain, is probably enough to “put Oscorp on the map” with or without controlled fusion `n` stuff. I also didn’t mind that Doc Ock touches the busted chip on the back of his neck and exposits something like “Oh no! The chip on the back of my neck is busted!” although we TOTALLY saw it happen and could probably figure it out without having him say it out loud. Mostly I was stoked by the goodness of Alfred Molina, who worked out a lot of action and monologues that could have turned really sour. Goes to show how effective it is to cast a regular dude as a bad guy — like Arnold Vosloo in The Mummy and not like Arnold Schwarzenegger in whatever the hell Batman he was in.
- Okay, one more round of silly. Poor James Franco got saddled with some terrible dialogue jobs. Not only does he have to say “put Oscorp on the map in a way my father never did,” like, forty times, but there’s a scene where he’s getting drunk (also saddled with the Sharon Stone school of acting like you’re drunk) at a party and has to toss off some 250-word essay on what’s bothering him. I forget what it was. But it was silly.
- Okay, maybe some more silly. Doc Ock ends up with the funds to pull of his sciencey project, but, in the bank-robbing sequence that’s shown, he doesn’t seem to get away with any money. And how and where does he buy all his sciencey equipment with his totally obviously stolen money — eBay? Best Buy? Some kickin` garage sales?
- Besides all these tiny things that didn’t bother me, there was one thing that did: Mary Jane running out on her wedding. The astronaut guy seemed like he deserved better — he was game for the upside-down kissy and all — and it doesn’t reflect well on ol` Emm Jay. I prefer this scenario — she runs out of a dress fitting instead, so Raimi still gets his slow-motion skirt-hiking run through the city but Mary Jane doesn’t come across as so much of a flibberty-jibbit. You could still have Jenna Jameson, er, Jimmy Jameson, aw, you know, J. K. Simmons standing by to deliver some cheapskate comedy about whether the dress can be returned if it’s worn out of the store (sure, he’s the father of the groom, but if he’s paying for catering at the reception he’s probably stuck with the dress, too). While I`m picking wedding nits (not hung up on weddings — I just lived through my sister’s and shall never forget it), what ran through my feeble shallow mind as Mary Jane took Peter Parker’s face in her hands was surely somebody would have made her get her nails done. It is after all part and parcel of turning the bride into some fantasy bouffant confection to emphasize the eventual ravages of time.
- Anyway. I liked this movie. What I liked it for the most — what made me go “Guh GUH!” at the screen, despite having no heckling partner to share the moment with, her having seen the movie already with her HUSBAND can you imagine — is that it had, with no prior indication to soften the shock, Hal Sparks! Hal Sparks! If I try to tell you how Jon Stewart and Hal Sparks were my surrogate lovers in `99-`00, I still don’t think you`ll understand. He was born in Kentucky — I was born in Kentucky. He’s 5`8″ — I`m 5`8″. He hosted “Talk Soup” — I watched “Talk Soup.” And now there is no degree of separation between him and Bruce Campbell! Can you imagine? Sam Raimi, you RULE!
5 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Can You Hit On a Waiter? Survey Says…
Posted by Tory, August 28, 2004 on 8:00 pm | In Amusements |The other day I went to a restaurant. The waiter was perty. So perty I was thrown way off my game and ended up doing a lot of downward glancing and giggling when I should have been bubbling with lively ripostes. Probably best — if you’re going to flirt ineptly with the waiter, it’s better to not be too loud about it.
But it makes me wonder — is it OK to hit on a waiter? Or does it violate the polite commandment that thou shalt not corner one at one’s place of business? I have a friend who’s married now to a man she met while waiting tables, but I think the trick there is that he hit on her when he met her, and not later, which would have violated the second polite commandment that thou shalt not indicate to a stranger that thou had been thinking of them when they weren’t around.
He was awful perty. But I do realize hitting on a waiter is like going up to a fish tank and tapping on it while the fish reel around going OHHHH FUUUUUUUUCK… I`m probably too embarrassed to go back to this particular restaurant, so this particular waiter is off the hook, but for future reference it would be good to know:
Can a waiter be hit on? What is the correct way to do it? Or would it just be creepy? It is my life’s objective to be neither creep, nor fink, nor any other fifties` epithet.
No Comments yet »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
-
I think it has something to do with the fact that they are usually standing above you…and you sort of have to look up at them without looking like a puppy. i hit on waiters, but i`d wait til i stood up to ask `em out `er whatever. if im going to get turned down, id rather be as high up as possible before i am taken down a peg.
Comment by Pf — December 31, 1969 #
-
Final report: went back to the restaurant and asked for his section, but he wasn`t working. Have achieved full stalk potential. Must never return. Am now formally done with this particular project, but look forward to applying my knowledge in the future. Rock.
Comment by Tory — December 31, 1969 #
-
Arrghhh, source of grave concern. Is it better to hit on a waiter to his face, like, “Hey, what do you do when you`re not waiting, snerk snerk,” or to write your number on the receipt, so he doesn`t have to worry about how rejecting you is going to affect his tip? This is my friendly co-heckler`s advice, and probably what I should have done at the time.
Comment by Tory — December 31, 1969 #
-
Tory - If I were your waiter I certainly wouldn`t mind. You`re smart and funny and attractive. Most men I know would agree. End of story.
Comment by anonymous coward — December 31, 1969 #
-
All right, we`ll do it.
Comment by Two Kings — December 31, 1969 #
-
As a former waiter I can heartily recommend hitting on him. There is an awful lot of flirting going on when you do that job, but very little of it is at all serious. In fact, most of it is from women old enough to be your mum who have drunk far too much gin and keep grabbing your arse. (This is what happens in the UK, anyway. Maybe the States is more civilised…) Therefore if someone who you`re actually attracted to makes a move it is a great feeling and is totally not against any commandments or, as far as I know, laws. As for when to actually do it, I`d say after you`ve paid, but before you leave. That way you can escape easily if it goes wrong, and you aren`t left hanging around like a lemon if it goes well. Get in there, Tory!
Comment by Seth Welsh — December 31, 1969 #
-
Yeah, what Tory said. I think tt`s much better to leave it on their terms, leave a note with your number. I`m a waitress, and granted, I don`t get hit on a lot, but I enjoy flirting with my customers. Definitely go for it.
Comment by Alena — December 31, 1969 #
-
Hit it. Take advantage of him - or her - whatever. You only live once, you might as well give it a shot. Dudes like getting hit on. It strokes their ego. Guys like being stroked.
Comment by Jeff — December 31, 1969 #
-
There was a sushi restaurant near my house that was the Land of Droolable Waiters. (Closed now, but reopening in a few months.) Every single one of them was cute. But remembering my own days of waiting tables, and how I felt about getting hit on, I never hit on any of these guys. (But I was an eighteen-year-old girl, getting hit on by fifty-something alcoholics. Skanky. Creepy. This is totally different, isn`t it? I`m not skanky or creepy… And besides, these are guys — aren`t they less likely to think I`m-being-skanked-on?) There`s a bartender at another restaurant in the neighborhood that I have a total thing for, too, but I don`t hit on her because I can`t even begin to pretend to myself that she`s not being hit on hour in and hour out for all of her working life, and that she hates that part of the job. So I don`t hit on her. But the cute sushi waiters? Oh, I can hit on them, can`t I? One of them has a motorcycle out back — can`t I ask for a ride on it? Please?
Comment by Sanguinity — December 31, 1969 #
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

Mmm… Hal Sparks…
Comment by astarael — December 31, 1969 #
English is my first language, but you wouldn`t know it from that post.
Comment by Michael Duff — December 31, 1969 #
I`m doing to insert a shameless link to my review now because I think it will make you laff: http://www.livejournal.com/users/michaelduff/197482.html Warning, spoilers and stuff.
Comment by Michael Duff — December 31, 1969 #
Hal Sparks is a god. That scene made my life.
Comment by Lis — December 31, 1969 #
Her nails TOTALLY bothered the crap out of me. Thank goodness I`m not a freak.
Comment by Faith — December 31, 1969 #